Karnofsky performance status kps and eastern cooperative oncology group ecog ps are the most widely used tools. Pdf moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance status. Performance status was measured using all three scales for. The australiamodified karnofsky performance scale akps how. It can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies and to assess the prognosis in individual patients. The merger brought together the strengths and capabilities of two highly respected organizations. Performance score based on clinician assessment in increments of 10. Ps assessment has been shown to correlate with survival in many cancer forms 7, 8. Jul 19, 20 the karnofsky performance status kps is a widely used method to assess the functional status of a patient. The australiamodified kps akps blends kps and tkps to accommodate any setting of care.
The karnofsky score runs from 100 to 0, where 100 is perfect health and 0 is death. You must add this site to your popup blockers list of allowed sites. The karnofsky scale sometimes called the karnofsky index was devised by two american doctors in the 1940s david karnofsky and joseph burchenal as an attempt to try and measure the more subjective side of the outcome of cancer treatment. Gordon zubrod, runs from 0 to 5, with 0 denoting perfect health and 5 death. The karnofsky scores purpose was to allow physicians to evaluate a patients ability to survive chemotherapy for cancer. Performance status eastern cooperative oncology group ecog is a physicianassigned score indicating a patients fitness for treatment. Ecog ps, eastern cooperative oncology group performance status. For example, in a study of 3825 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving 5fluorouracil, ecog ps of 0 and 1 was associated with a longer duration of survival compared to ecog ps 1.
How do clinicians rate patients performance status using the ecog. The eastern cooperative oncology group works primarily with member institutions to coordinate clinical trials. The karnofsky performance scale index allows patients to be classified as to their functional impairment. If you have questions regarding cancer andor cancer treatment options. The lower the karnofsky score, the worse the survival for most serious illnesses. Scientific problems in clinical scales, as demonstrated in. The pps uses five observerrated domains correlated to the karnofsky performance scale. Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature ks 7080 2. Eam device fulfilled the definition of acceptability. The karnofsky scale sometimes called the karnofsky index was devised by two american doctors in the 1940s david karnofsky and joseph burchenal as an attempt to try and measure the more subjective side of the outcome of cancer treatment in fact the scale relates purely to physical ability and covers 11 points, from normal health to death, each scored as a percentage. Table 3 moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance status. For years, the kps and ecog ps have been important tools in clinical practice.
Appraisal of the karnofsky performance status and proposal of a. Eastern cooperative oncology group ecog contact information. If you forgot your ecogacrin username andor password, or have any issuesquestions relating to the ecogacrin web application portal, please contact ecogacrin web application portal support this site requires popups and cookies. Ecog can also reveal functional connectivity and resolve finer taskrelated spatialtemporal dynamics, thereby advancing our understanding of largescale cortical processes. Four studies reported that karnofsky performance status kps had better interrater reliability than both the eastern cooperative oncology group performance status ecog ps and the palliative performance scale pps. Pdf the aim of our study was to assess whether the karnofsky performance status kps, the eastern cooperative oncology group ecog. Fully active, able to carry on all predisease performance without restriction.
Kelly 1 andarminshahrokni 1,2 gastrointestinal oncology service, department of medicine, memorial sloan kettering cancer center, new york, ny, usa. Patientrated ps scores versus karnofsky ps kps number of patients patientrated ps. We have detected that you have a popup blocker installed. Performance status assessment by using ecog eastern.
Quizlet flashcards, activities and games help you improve your grades. Another common system is the eastern cooperative oncology group ecog system. The kps is used along tumor size and location as a prognostic factor of the ability of the patient to survive the proposed chemotherapy. Lung and upper gastrointestinal cancer patients ecog ps 02 activpal. This karnofsky score for performance status calculator scale runs from 100 to 0 where 100 means the patients condition is normal and 0 indicates death. Combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced. Appraisal of the karnofsky performance status and proposal. The karnofsky performance status kps is a widely used method to assess the functional status of a patient. Ecog itself does not provide treatment advice to patients or their families on individual cases. Dec 04, 2018 the karnofsky performance scale index is an assessment tool for functional impairment. Primed in greal britain scientific problems in clinical scales, as demonstrated in the karnofsky index of performance status t.
The present study aimed to evaluate the interobserver reliability and. Although the ecog and karnofskylansky performance score systems are based on similar principles, the scales are not the same. Performance status in patients with cancer oncology jama. Moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance status. Parallel scoring systems include the global assessment of functioning gaf score, which has been incorporated as the fifth. To duplicate the scale, please cite the reference above and credit the eastern cooperative oncology group, robert comis m. The australiamodified karnofsky performance status akps. Since 1955, ecog has performed practicechanging multicenter cancer clinical trials, working with more than 6000 physicians, nurses, pharmacists, statisticians, clinical research associates, and cancer research advocates from the united states and. Karnofsky by recognizing an oncologist who has made outstanding contributions to cancer research, diagnosis, andor treatment. The karnofsky performance status kps is a gold standard scale.
Oncologists rely upon measurement instruments of functional performance such as the karnofsky or eastern cooperative oncology group performance status scales that were developed over fifty years ago to determine a patients suitability for systemic treatment. The karnofsky performance scale is an assessment tool intended to assist clinicians and caretakers in gauging a patients functional status and ability to carry out activities of daily living. Validity assessment can be divided into several different subtypes of evaluation, including. Performance status ps assessment is an integral part of the decisionmaking process in cancer care.
Pdf conversion of karnofsky performance status kps and. The kps is an 11 point rating scale which ranges from normal functioning 100 to dead 0 in ten point increments. The most generally used are the karnofsky score and the zubrod score, the latter being used in publications by the who. The palliative performance scale pps palliative care. The present study aimed to evaluate the interobserver reliability. The karnofskys index of performance status kps and the eastern cooperative oncology group performance status scale ecog ps are widely used methods of. The ecog acrin web application portal requires the use of popup windows. The ecog performance status and the karnofsky performance status are two widely used methods to assess the functional status of a patient. Interrater reliability in performance status assessment. In clinical trials the two assessment methodologies are used as. This article describes the development and validation of an instrument to assess cognitively mediated functional abilities in older adults, everyday cognition ecog. Functional assessment of cancer therapyesophagus facte is a patientreported, healthrelated qualityoflife hrqol instrument containing an oesophageal cancer subscale ecs. These scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a patients disease is progressing, assess how the. Ecog performance status scale study guide by dschreier includes 10 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more.
The karnofsky performance scale index is an assessment tool for functional impairment. Review article moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance status assessments with new technologies ciaram. The pps is a reliable and valid tool and correlates well with actual survival and median survival time for cancer patients in outpatient and ambulatory settings. The other scale sometimes used is the karnofsky scale. Its advantage over the karnofsky scale lies in its simplicity. This can be used to compare effectiveness of different therapies and to assess the prognosis in individual patients. If you forgot your ecog acrin username andor password, or have any issuesquestions relating to the ecog acrin web application portal, please contact ecog acrin web application portal support this site requires popups and cookies. This greater accuracy for the kps is illustrated by the finding that patients with a score on the ecog scale 2 were equally likely to have a kps score of 60 or 70 or 80. It has especially proven useful for advancing braincomputer interfacing bci technology for decoding a users intentions to enhance or improve communication 6 and control 7.
The eastern cooperative oncology group ecog score published by oken et al. The ecog performance status is in the public domain therefore available for public use. This book summarized the results of a symposium in new york in 1948. Karnofsky and ecog performance status scoring in lung. In most serious illnesses, the lower the karnofsky score, the worse the likelihood of survival. Karnofsky performance status scale evidence search nice. While both ps scales are useful, the greater specificity of the kps. Kps was the first performance status scale described in 1949 3. Karnofsky d, burchenal j, the clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer.
Karnofsky performance status scale definitions rating % criteria able to carry on normal 100 normal no complaints. The existing literature cites both good and bad interrater reliability of ps scores. Eastern cooperative oncology group ecog and karnofsky performance status kps scores are commonly used for this purpose by. Ecog performance status radiology reference article. Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e. In some studies, the absolute agreement rate of these tools between observers has been moderate to low. Performance status in patients with cancer oncology. Median 100 7 90 90 25 78 80 49 51 70 14 37 60 7 26 correlation. Progress in cancer research is coupled with increased treatment complexity reliant upon accurate patient selection. Some transplant centers may prefer to collect and use the ecog performance score as opposed to the karnofskylansky score. Both scales have been in the public domain for many years as ways to classify a patient according to their functional impairment, compare the effectiveness of therapies, and assess the prognosis of a patient. Assessment of patient acceptability using compliance based on analysis of movement data. Fully active, able to carry on all predisease activities with restriction ks 90100 1. Oncology group ecog performance status ps scores to help.
It has been found useful for purposes of identifying and tracking potential care needs. Eastern cooperative oncology group ecog as published in am. The ecog is an informantrated questionnaire comprised of multiple subscales. Moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance status assessments with new technologies. The ecog performance status is a scale used to assess how a patients disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis e. Can performance status ps be determined accurately by. If you have questions regarding cancer andor cancer treatment options, please contact your personal physician or the national cancer institute through the web or by telephone at 18004cancer. The most commonly used is typically referred to as the zubrod or ecog eastern cooperative oncology group scale. Confirmatory factor analysis cfa was used to examine its factor structure. Table 3 moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance. Correlation of performance status ps with outcome measures in cancer. Burchenal in 1949 in an article originally published as a chapter of the book evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents, edited by colin m. The thornemodified kps tkps focuses on communitybased care and has been shown to be more relevant to palliative care settings than the original kps.
This scale ranges from 0 to 4, with 0 being fully functional and asymptomatic, and 4 being bedridden. The australiamodified karnofsky performance scale akps. It is important to assess a patients performance on a regular basis, especially as the effects of hiv progress. Due to their subjective nature, both ecog ps and kps scales have been. The karnofsky s index of performance status kps and the eastern cooperative oncology group performance status scale ecog ps are widely used methods of assessing the functional status of cancer. The australiamodified karnofsky performance scale akps the australiamodified karnofsky performance scale akps is a measure of the patients overall performance status or ability to perform their activities of daily living. These scales and criteria are used by doctors and researchers to assess how a patients disease is progressing, assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the patient, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. Results for karnofsky performance status scale 1 50 of 100 sorted by relevance date click export csv or ris to download the entire page or use. Review article moving beyond karnofsky and ecog performance. The karnofsky score for performance status was created by karnofsky et al.
438 165 626 1233 424 1230 678 142 577 1155 340 709 669 366 277 543 1413 263 754 595 293 607 1192 806 1225 146 745 272 1445 705 66 592 114 116 1009 1132 851 135 1040 1390 1199 303 1232 1204